Full site in English | Français | Español
ECB Project
CARE CRS Mercy Corps Oxfam Save The Children World Vision
  • Home
  • The Project
  • In The Field
  • Staff Capacity
  • Accountability
  • Risk Reduction
  • Resources & Learning
  • Simulations
  • Building Trust in Diverse Teams
    • View Concise Facilitation Handbook
      • Summary
      • Introduction
      • How to build trust in teams
      • The ten criteria for trust
      • Tool 1: Appreciative inquiry
      • Tool 2: Trust cards
      • Tool 3: Trust walk
      • Tool 4: Communication charter
      • Tool 5: Aligning working practices
      • Tool 6: Email activity
      • Tool 7: Treasure hunting
      • Tool 8: Time lines
      • Appendix A
    • Download Toolkit for Emergency Response
  • National Staff Development
  • Staff Retention and Turnover
  • Surge Capacity Research
  • Other initiatives

Sign up to the ECB e-newsletter

Get our free quarterly email newsletter direct to your inbox.

ECB Project on Twitter

What lessons can be taken from the humanitarian response to the food crisis in Kenya? UN-IASC release their evaluation http://t.co/iO0YmqiG 10th May

Share and Bookmark

E-mail page Add to favourites Share and bookmark

Download Handbook

Building Trust in Diverse Teams:

Concise version

PDF available in these languages:

  • English
  • Français
  • Español

View the concise version online in French and Spanish:

  • Bâtir la confiance au sein d’équipes diverses
  • Construyendo confianza en equipos diversos

Get the Guide

Full Version

Building Trust in Diverse Teams

160 pages
 

  Get Online > 

Download Resources

Handout 6a:
Email message (local perspective)

Available in these languages:

  • English

Handout 6b:
Email message (outside perspective)

Available in these languages:

  • English

Handout 6c:
Email analysis sheet

Available in these languages:

  • English

Handout 6d:
Cultural differences in communication style

Available in these languages:

  • English

Tool 6: Email activity

Learning objectives

This  tool  makes  people  aware  of  and  encourages  a  discussion  about  different communication styles that may exist within the team, and how to reconcile them

Overall time required

1 hour

(NB The activity can be split between two meetings if appropriate)

Group size

10 +

Relevant  Trust Criteria

Openness, Reciprocity, Goodwill, Inclusion

Resources  required

Copies of the ten criteria for trust

Copies Email Message (National Perspective)

Copies Email Message (International Perspective)

Copies of Email Analysis sheet

Copies of Cultural Differences in Communication Style

Paper-clips or one stapler per group

Facilitation tips

This tool shows how differences relating to cultural diversity can affect levels of trust when communicating at a distance with a colleague they have not yet met.

You can take a break between steps 12 and 13 of the exercise. When using this tool remember:

  • Do not assume that staff from other countries (international staff) will respond to the activity in a low-context style and national staff in a high-context style.
  • There  will  be  a  mix  based  on  personal  style,  experience,  and  professional background. Some people will consciously adapt their style to their perception of the needs and preferences of others.
  • If you do not have a mix of national and international staff in your group, divide the group into two and distribute Handout 6a to one half and Handout 6b to the other half.
  • The email can be written from two different perspectives – from a national to an international member of staff or vice-versa. In both cases the sender is unhappy with what their colleague has been doing and needs to communicate that and to make them change.

How it works

1. When writing the email, participants are forced to deal with a dilemma. If they are blunt they risk damaging a new and potentially important relationship. If they focus on maintaining good relations they risk their colleague not understanding what they need to do

2. The activity raises awareness of the reasons behind different styles of response to this dilemma. It helps the team communicate better and builds trust by understanding different approaches to communication in difficult situations.

3. Introduce the session objectives and the ten criteria for trust (see pages 10 and 11).

4. Divide the group in smaller groups of 5 to 6 people, distribute Handouts 6a and 6b (The Email Messages) making sure members of the same group get the same message. When possible, give the National Perspective version (Handout 6a) to the national members of the team and the International Perspective version (Handout 6b) to team members from other countries.

5. Ask each person to write an individual response to the email they have been given. (10 minutes)

6. Distribute Handout 6d and ask participants to read it.

7. Assign each group a letter (A, B,  C, etc ). Then, ask participants to mark their completed email sheet with their names and an A, B, or C

8. Give the group A emails to group B, group B emails to group C, and group C emails to group A, etc

9. Distribute Handout 6c: Email Analysis to each group and explain its contents to the group.

10. Ask them to do the following:

  • Attach an Email Analysis sheet to each email (back to back) with the stapler or paper-clips provided and start filling in the email analysis sheet for each email, passing the email to the person on their left each time they have finished with one.
  • They should continue until each group member has read and scored each email.

11. Now ask each person in the group to take one email each and calculate the average scores for the emotional reaction (faces) and for the average low/high- context rating and enter the results in the appropriate spaces in the row marked ‘Results’.

12. Arrange for all emails to be handed back to the original writers together with the attached scoring sheet. Give people a few seconds to look at their scores.

13. Now ask everyone to stand up with their emails and scores in their hand and ask them to form a semi-circle with the very low-context average scores at one end and the very high-context average scores at the other.

14. Ask people at the low-context end if they would share their intention in writing the email in this way and ask them if they would mind if you (the facilitator) read it for everyone to hear. Ask them what emotional reaction they got to their email.

15. Facilitate a discussion of the advantages and disadvantages of communicating in this style. Then choose an email from the high context end of the semi-circle. Repeat.

16. Conclude the exercise by saying something like: ‘In this exercise we have explored different communication styles and how some are too direct and others too indirect, and the emotional reactions they may cause in different individuals. It is important to understand these differences and to try to reconcile them.’

ECHO UK aid

Contact us Sitemap

© Copyright 2011, Emergency Capacity Building Project . Website by Adept and Fruity Solutions.