Full site in English | Français | Español
ECB Project
CARE CRS Mercy Corps Oxfam Save The Children World Vision
  • Home
  • The Project
  • In The Field
  • Staff Capacity
  • Accountability
  • Risk Reduction
  • Resources & Learning
Home > Staff Capacity > Simulations > View Emergency Simulations Guide > Preparation & Implementation - ECB Simulation #2 > Debriefing Simulation #2
  • About this Guide
  • Overview: Aims, Objectives & Audience
  • What’s on the CD?
  • Training Needs Assessment
  • Materials Adaptation
  • Equipment & Supplies Planning
  • Venue & Conference Room Setup
  • Role-players & Role-playing
  • Preparation & Implementation - ECB Simulation #1
  • Preparation & Implementation - ECB Simulation #2
    • Preparing for Simulation #2
    • Running Simulation #2
    • Debriefing Simulation #2
  • If You Must Run an Abridged Version
  • Annex 1: Experiential Learning Review
  • Annex 2: A Facilitation Primer
  • Annex 3: Using Small Groups

Sign up to the ECB e-newsletter

Get our free quarterly email newsletter direct to your inbox.

ECB Project on Twitter

RT @RexBrynen: PAXsims: Simulations and their use in the humanitarian sector http://t.co/SQAYi2vSDK by @davidhockaday @ecbproject 17th May

Share and Bookmark

E-mail page Add to favourites Share and bookmark

Download Guide

The Emergency Simulations Guide:

Available in these languages:

  • English
  • Español

Debriefing Simulation #2

This section offers guidance on the debriefing of ECB Simulation #2, generally conducted the day after the exercise.

Rationale

Debriefing is an essential phase in the simulation experience.  Learners are encouraged to make connections between the experiencesgained from the simulation and their real-life experience. In essence, this is the phase in which the lessons from the exercise are analysed, generalised, and learned (see Annex 1:  The Experiential Learning Cycle.)  There are numerous reasons for spending the time to debrief the simulation experience fully: 

  • To answer learners’ questions
  • To sort out and clarify learners’ thinking
  • To reinforce specific learning points
  • To link key simulation actions, decisions, and topics to “real life”

Debriefing generally occurs after the simulation has been completed  There are some cases, however, where the simulation administrators may decide during the simulation exercise to hold short debriefing sessions as needed to point out critical issues.

Approach

The debriefing is intended to allow participants to analyse the various challenges confronted and measures taken (or not taken) in the simulation exercise. As each simulation will inevitably pose its own unique learning opportunities – i.e. issues, concerns, challenges unique to each exercise – the approach to debriefing should emphasize flexibility and adaptation.

It may become clear during the actual simulation or the venting sessions, or through informal talks held after the exercise that a previously unanticipated coordination issue or set of coordination issues took center stage and became a critical concern of the participants. Simulation administrators are encouraged to adapt the debriefing as needed to ensure that such issues are analysed and discussed as needed.

Duration

Many simulation organisers make the mistake of thinking that the exercise is in and of itself the actual learning experience and, as a result, tend to underestimate the importance of debriefing the exercise. In fact, the simulation exercise it is only one aspect of the learning experience. True learning requires reflection, generalisation of lessons learned, and some thinking about how the lessons learned from the exercise might be applied in one’s real working life. These aspects of learning require a well-planned, facilitated debriefing of the simulation exercise.

A general rule: plan to spend at least as much time debriefing/analysing the simulation as you spent in the actual exercise – if not longer. That is, if you have run the full six hour long simulation (including Hour Zero), you should plan on a full day of debriefing and analysis (09:00 – 17:00 with time for coffee breaks and a sit-down lunch.) Even an “abridged” version of the simulation – say, two or three hours of exercise, including Hour Zero – will still likely require at least a half day of debriefing to reap the benefits of the exercise.

Focus on Learning Objectives

Remember:  the simulation is conducted to achieve - or work towards achieving – defined learning objectives. The facilitation team should ensure that debriefing sessions tackle the issues and concerns inherent in those objectives.  For example, if one of the simulation objectives is to enable participants to “analyse and describe management behaviors that either foster or inhibit multi-agency collaboration and coordination”, then ensure that somewhere in the debriefing this issue is addressed. 

That is, if participants have addressed this concern in the simulation exercise, ask how they proceeded: “Which behaviors seemed to foster the coordiation process?” “Which behaviors inhibited coordination?”  “What opportunities did you find for enhancing coordination?”  “How did you take advantage of them?”

If they haven’t addressed this key concern in the simulation, then be sure to have the participants explain why not and how they might address this issue in a real emergency.

The critical point is to structure the debriefing questions to ensure that participants address key coordination concerns.

Developing the Agenda

The debriefing agenda should be adapted to ensure a focus on (a) the particular objectives of the simulation as worked out in advance with senior managers of the country or regional office, and (b) issues or challenges that arose during the exercise and appear to provide key learning opportunities. In general, the debriefing should include the following:

Session & Topic

Recommended Process

Time (est.)

Comment

Analysis of key coordination decisions (made or not made) that influenced simulation outcomes and the factors that led to those decisions

Small group brainstorming and prioritization followed by reports back to plenary and plenary discussions of results

1 ½ to 2 hours

This is particularly useful for agencies that are using the simulation in part to examine how well certain staff are able to carry out their NGO-related tasks while at the same time being expected to participate meaningfully in an inter-agency coordination process.

This sesion should consider what it means to coordinate and collaborate in stressful conditions: what kind of decisions are made, which decisions by the coordination group are deemed important or urgent, which decisions are delegated, and which are ignored due to NGO-specific requirements or demands.

Analysis of the inter-agency coordination process: procedures that were (or were not) applied

Small group brainstorming and prioritization followed by reports back to plenary

1 ½ to 2 hours

This is useful for identifying the key gaps in agency willingness and/or capacity to particpate in an emergency coordination porcess – and in the staff’s understanding of that process.

Presentation focused on various emergency coordination mechanisms, on barriers to coordination and on techniques to foster a coordinated, collaborative emergency response

Plenary presentation with Q&A / discussions

½ to 1 hour

A resource person knowledgeable in the various models of inter-agency coordination of humanitarian response should ideally make this presentation; the facilitator should ensure an interactive approach to enable participant concerns/questions to be addressed.

Action planning

Individual or small group discussions with feedback of one or two likely follow-up actions from each individual or small group

1 to 2 hours

This session is intended to ensure participants consider the application of the lessons learned from the exercise to the actual process of co-ordination in the country or region. The facilitator, in getting reports back on individual or group actions should encourage them to be specific in their actions: what will they do, by what date, with whom, etc.

 

The agenda used for the debriefing of the ECB Simulation #2 pilot in Sierra Leone was as follows:

0900 – 1030

Analysing Coordination Decisions

1030 – 1045

Break

1045 – 1130

Collaborative Decision-Making in Emergencies

1130 – 1300

Analysing Coordination Needs

1300 – 1400

Lunch

1400 – 1530

Simulation Design Analysis

1530 – 1545

Break

1545 – 1700

Action Planning (next steps)

 

Identifying Key Issues

Ideally, you – with input from the country office senior management – will have already identified the key coordination issues and concerns on which the debriefing will focus.  If this has not been done, a useful means of identifying these issues or concerns at the start of the debriefing is to ask participants to jot down on index cards their views on what they perceive as the most important issues raised during the exercise.  Have the participants write one issue per card and hand them in to the

facilitator (each participant may submit as many issues as needed, but be sure to tell them to include only one issue per card to facilitate grouping.)

The cards can be taped to the wall or flip chart and organized into general categories (such as: coordination strengths vs. coordination weakenesses) or into more detailed categories as needed (such as: coordination & contingency planning, logistics, inter-agency communications, decision-making in an inter-agency body, coordination leadership, delegation to partners, working with technical clusters or sectors,  coordinating emergency information & reporting, etc.)

The actual categories chosen to organize these issues will depend upon the learning objectives and identified staff needs with regard to cooridnation knowledge, skills and attitudes.) Different categories of issues can then be assigned to different groups for analysis and discussion.  Another technique is to post categories of issues around the conference room and let the participants self-select into discussion groups by moving to that area of the conference room.

Use of the Experiential Learning Cycle

Use the Experiential Learning Cycle (review Annex 1 of this Guide) to structure the debriefing agenda and to ensure that participants have the opportunity to develop plans to feed simulation lessons back into the country office’s operating reality:

The coination simulation has clearly just provided a wealth of “concrete experience” shared by all participants with regard to coordination. They have been asked to reflect individually on the experience (i.e. responding to the questions on the “Personal Reflection Sheet.) Time for sharing individual reflections should be built into the beginning of the debriefing day.  Subsequent sessions should be structured to engage the group of participants in the process of generalization – and then to discuss the application of lessons learned about coordination from the simulation and debriefing to real life.  

Note how in the sample agenda used in the Sierra Leone Pilot, debriefing sessions were devoted to “Analysing Coordination Decisions” and “Analysing Coordination Needs.” These sessions enabled participants to share their reflections on several key simulation topics and then, in small groups, to identify the “generalized” lessons learned from their experience.

Note also in the sample agenda, there was a session called “Action Planning.”  This session enabled participants to take the generalized lessons they themselves had identified and develop action plans – to enable application of those lessons to real life.

Debriefing Techniques

Facilitation and presentation techniques used for the debriefing will depend upon the particular learning objectives as well as your own training/facilitation skills. Techniques you may find useful include:

Technique

Comment

Plenary presentations by the facilitator, resources persons or the participants themselves

Presentations should generally be prepared in advance of the debriefing day and focused on the learning objectives of the simulation as agreed with the senior managers of the hosting NGO.  You may find, however, unforeseen events of issues that arise during the simulation require that one or more presentations be developed the evening after the exercise – before the debriefing.

In either case, the facilitator should review the presentation materials with the presenter in advance of the presentation session and coach the presenter in the use of participatory, interactive style. 

Plenary discussions

This ECB Simulation effort is an initative in adult learning and capacity-building: adult learning principles should be observed throughout all debriefing sessions.  Whenever plenary discussions are held, the facilitator should encourage questions and answers from the participants themselves.  A participatory rather than directive approach to learning is appropriate here.

Small group / team-based discussions or analyses of key simulation challenges or lessons

More work, more analysis, and more lessons are produced in small groups. Participants who will naturally tend to remain quiet in plenary often “come alive” in small groups.  This mode is highly recommended for a probing analysis of the simulation.

Written assignments by participants intended to encourage individual reflection and application of lessons learned.

The participants should note their simulation lessons on the Participant Reflection Sheet directly after the simulation exercise.  If there is time for additional written assignments, these may be useful in getting individuals to reflect more deeply on their or others’ actions in the simulation. 

 
ECHO UK aidUSAID logo

Privacy and Cookie Policy Contact us Sitemap

© Copyright 2011, Emergency Capacity Building Project . Website by Adept and Fruity Solutions.